dear: Why does he refer to the flower to intimately? Does this anticipate the coming lines?
if: Are they? Perhaps they are made for more than literal seeing, but also for understanding the truth beyond the physical.
Then Beauty is its own excuse of being: This is the core of the poem. In other words, Beauty does not have to fit into a great theological plan or be "useful" to mankind, or even be seen by many people or acknowledged as "beautiful" in the same sense that the rose is. It needs no ulterior purpose beyond its being. In Nature, Emerson wrote of Beauty, "This element I call an ultimate end. No reason can be asked or given why the soul seeks beauty. Beauty, in its largest and profoundest sense, is one expression for the universe."
rival: What sort of contest is this? Is it in the poet's mind? Or for most other people who don't see and appreciate the rhodora?
I never thought to ask: This line seems to tell us that when we think about life, and better understand the mystery around it, we're able to appreciate it all the more. This relates to the concept from "Self-reliance" about thinking for yourself, not blindly going through life, never really knowing anything. [Kristin Blocher]
simple ignorance: This is a wise, though simple question, such as a child might ask.
self-same power: The rhodera is derived from the same universal higher power that created him. He's connecting humans with nature, saying that every living thing has the same divine essence.[Alanda Perry] Here he is talking about God in terms similar to Bryant in "To a Waterfowl."
brought you: This is quite characteristic of Emerson and of Romanticism. He seems to assert here, once again, the interconnectedness between all things. I think this also coincides with other assertions made in his poem, "Each and All." The beauty of the flower, which he asserts in line 14 as the flower's reason for existence, is later enjoyed and recognized by the speaker. Thus, the flower's purpose, to give delight to others through its beauty, is fulfilled by the speaker's observance of the flower's beauty and resultant delight--and then his poem. The Power which brought the speaker to the flower also brought the flower to the speaker, in order that its purpose might be fulfilled. Or rather, in order that "each" is recognized in its perfection because of the "all" in which it exists. [Mary Newcomb] |